Analysis Paper Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 2

Analysis composing - Assignment ExampleThe defendant in this trial was U.S surgical incision of evaluator and they purge forward their jobs. The argument of the defendant was that The Controlled Substances Act has formed a nationwide system which control and regulates controlled substances. The defendant argued by using aninformative rulestating physician-assisted suicide basically debased the Controlled Substances Act(CSA), and it would lead to the cancellation of the license of the physician.The Trial address gave its closing. The Trial Court gave its decision in favor of Oregon State. The Trial Court reached to the decision that The Department of Justice had no right to deal with the issue of physician-assisted suicide under the Controlled Substances Act. This decision put forward the fact that CSA was concerned with the management of banned drugs and did not have to play a exercise in the healthcare field. The Trial Court stated that medicals decisions were matters of the States. The Appellate Court confirmed that The Department of Justice had appealed. The appellate court was the Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court stated that Congress decision was clear and they also confirmed the purposes of CSA, which were to take hold a check on the use of banned drugs and the regularization of criminal activity. Supreme Court gave reference of Chevron Doctrine in which courts were not bound to birth by the judicial decisions of The Department of Justice. The Supreme Court brought into their knowledge that the federal government had the authority to keep a check on the medications that were employ in the medical profession. But particularly the CSA did not yield the banning of suicidal medications by The Department of Justice. A dissent was also filed in which an argument was presented that drugs used for the purpose of suicide did not fall in the category of licensed medical practice and