Market-based or Government Control Issues Surrounding Obama Care Research Paper

Market-based or Government Control Issues Surrounding Obama heraldic bearing - Research Paper ExampleIt concluded that ObamaCare has its flaws, but it bottom be improved during its implementation by enhancing consumer access to health sustenance information and by helping hoi polloi make the most optimal choices for their conditions. It also suggested financing from wider sources, so that costs can be diminish in the long run. Market-based or government control? Issues surrounding Obama Care Health care continues to be a primary concern in the United States, because of multiple issues of access to and availability of efficient and shade health care. More than 47 million Americans are uninsured, life expectancy continues to increase because of advances in medical examination technology, while healthcare costs spiral out of control (Sultz& Young, 2008, p.xvii). Furthermore, Republicans and Democrats cannot agree on the goals and budgeting for the American healthcare system. Thei r ideological differences also impede the passing of a politically moderate healthcare bill. After a protracted political battle, in March 2010, Congress approved President Barack Obamas Patient Protection and inexpensive Care Act (PPACA), a comprehensive state effort that aims to resolve various healthcare issues. PPACA aims to sanely nationalize the healthcare system and to enhance healthcare resources and options. Critics labeled PPACA as ObamaCare to differentiate it from other election solutions to Americas diverse healthcare problems (Shi & Singh, 2007, p.ix). This paper seeks to explore the issues surrounding PPACA. It conducted a review of literature, where many authors agreed that PPACA is a flawed response to Americas market-driven healthcare system (Atlas, 2010 Shi & Singh, 2007), while Herzlinger (2004) and Rooney and Perrin (2008) have different ideas of what the American healthcare system should look like. They agreed, however, that a good healthcare bill should pro mote patient autonomy. A number of authors argued against PPACA, because they assert that it is a collective intervention that does not fit the market-run socio-economic beat of modern association and it is a costly and unconstitutional infringement on individual choices and corporate. This paper will now exempt the drawbacks of ObamaCare, and one of the main complaints is that ObamaCare is fundamentally socialist and does not fit into the market-run socio-economic model of modern society. A socialist model revolves around authoritarianism. Williamson (2010) criticized the socialist leanings of the Obama administration in his book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialism. He (2011) describe PPACA as socialist, because it is based on a central planning model, with socialist features of income-redistribution, economic leveling, the co-opting and nationalization of sequestered enterprises and the elevation of an elite planning class (p.237). He did not believe that a socialis t model can resolve the underlying issues of high medical and insurance costs in the nation, and for him, it will save replicate the 1970s British healthcare issues of poor implementation and poor results. In Health Care USA, Sultz and Young (2008) analyzed the complex American healthcare system. They highlighted the characteristics of American healthcare that evade an effective socializing process. First, the healthcare system is too large to be managed by the state alone The U.S. health care system is the worlds eight largest economy, second to